Why this differs from similar rows:
Ab initio calculation for the Pbnm (orthorhombic) phase (K0=259, K'0=3.9); sibling row is for a distinct hypothetical cubic phase of the same composition (K0=258, K'0=4.0).
Why this differs from similar rows:
Ab initio calculation for a hypothetical cubic phase (K0=258, K'0=4.0); sibling row is for the Pbnm (orthorhombic) phase of the same composition (K0=259, K'0=3.9).
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites a different ab initio study, a full-potential LAPW calculation by Cohen et al. [28], distinct from the two experimental citations in sibling rows.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cited as the low end of an interlaboratory range, from Yeganeh-Haeri et al. [27]; sibling rows cite a different experimental study [20] or a theoretical LAPW calculation [28].
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cited as the high end of an interlaboratory range, from Knittle and Jeanloz [20]; sibling rows cite a different experimental study [27] or a theoretical LAPW calculation [28].