Why this differs from similar rows:
K0 derived using the (200) reflection alone for volume, preferred by authors due to anisotropic broadening under slightly non-hydrostatic conditions; sibling row uses 3 reflections.
Why this differs from similar rows:
K0 derived using (111)+(200)+(220) reflections combined for volume; differs from sibling row's (200)-only approach due to anisotropic broadening from non-hydrostatic conditions.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Fit to Fe0.99O data using all points P<14 GPa; sibling row instead excludes data above 6 GPa, giving a lower K0 (150 vs 161 GPa here).
Why this differs from similar rows:
Fit to Fe0.99O data excluding points above 6 GPa; sibling row uses the full P<14 GPa dataset instead, giving a higher K0 (161 GPa).