Why this differs from similar rows:
Fits K_T0' freely from all volume data (7.2, poorly constrained since compression is under 4%); sibling row fixes K_T0' to 4 instead.
Why this differs from similar rows:
K_T0' fixed to 4 (consistent with the MgSiO3 perovskite value) rather than fit freely; sibling row fits K' freely to 7.2 on the same run's data.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 1: DAC, polycrystalline, methanol-ethanol medium, Pmax 7 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 2: DAC, polycrystalline, no pressure medium, Pmax 112 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 3: DAC, single-crystal, methanol-ethanol-water medium, Pmax 10 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Refs. 4, 5: Brillouin scattering, single-crystal; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 6: DAC, single-crystal, methanol-ethanol/Ne media, Pmax 13 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 8: Brillouin scattering, single-crystal; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 9: infrared spectroscopy, polycrystalline and single-crystal; other rows in this compilation use Brillouin scattering instead.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 10: DAC, polycrystalline, argon medium, Pmax 60 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 11: DAC, polycrystalline, argon/no medium, Pmax 94 GPa; other rows in this compilation cite different original references/methods.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 12 (Akamatsu et al.): molecular dynamics calculation, not an experiment, Pmax 60 GPa; other rows in this compilation are DAC experiments.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 21 (Yusa et al.): DAC XRD experiment, methanol-ethanol-water medium, Pmax 15 GPa; sibling row is a molecular-dynamics calculation instead.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 23 (Weidner): reports Pmax 10 GPa, vs Pmax 9 GPa in the other two Weidner rows in this table; paper does not further explain the three separate values.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table II Ref. 12 (Akamatsu et al.): molecular dynamics calculation, Pmax 60 GPa; sibling row is a DAC XRD experiment (Yusa et al.) instead.