Effects of Fe spin transition on the elasticity of (Mg, Fe)O magnesiowüstites and implications for the seismological properties of the Earth's lower mantle
10.1029/2006jb004730
· 2007
· Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
S. Speziale; V. E. Lee; S. M. Clark; Jung‐Fu Lin; M. Pasternak; Raymond Jeanloz
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.88 used to convert low-spin volumes; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.89-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.89; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88, 0.90-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.90; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.89, 0.91-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.91; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.90, 0.92-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.92; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.91, 0.93-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.93; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.92, 0.94-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.94; authors state this is their preferred model, unlike other assumed-ratio rows (0.88-0.93, 0.95-1.00) in the same table.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.95; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.94, 0.96-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.96; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.95, 0.97-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.97; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.96, 0.98-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.98; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.97, 0.99-1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 0.99; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.98, 1.00), each giving a different K0/K'.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Table 2 row assumes a fixed V0(LS)/V0(HS) ratio of 1.00; sibling rows use different assumed ratios (0.88-0.99), each giving a different K0/K'.