Why this differs from similar rows:
First fit described in text, using decompression data after annealing per the sample description; sibling row instead fits the entire compression+decompression data set.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Fit to the entire data set (compression and decompression), as explicitly stated in text ('secondly, we fit the entire data set'); sibling row corresponds to an initial/subset fit.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Jackson and Niesler [1982] ultrasonic interferometry, values from a polynomial fit; sibling row in this compilation cites a different original study (Chopelas 1996).
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Zha et al. [2000] Brillouin scattering; other rows in this compilation table cite different original studies.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Sinogeikin and Bass [2000] Brillouin scattering; other rows in this compilation table cite different original studies.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Chopelas [1996] fluorescent sideband measurement, values from a polynomial fit; sibling row cites a different original study (Jackson and Niesler 1982).
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Matsui et al. [2000] molecular dynamics simulation; compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Duffy and Ahrens [1995], a finite-strain fit derived from Jackson and Niesler [1982] data, distinct from that study's own direct entry elsewhere in the table.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Vassiliou and Ahrens [1981] shock-wave compression; compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Anderson and Andreatch [1966] acoustic (single crystal) measurement; compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Fei [1999] static compression, isothermal values (footnote c); compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Utsumi et al. [1998] static compression (large volume apparatus), isothermal values; text explicitly notes this result (K0T=153, K'0T=4.15) as a separately cited comparison.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Speziale et al. [2001] static compression DAC, isothermal values; compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Cites Dewaele et al. [2000] static compression DAC, isothermal values; compilation table cites a different original study per row.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Refit of Fei [1999] static compression data to 12 GPa with K' fixed at 4.15; sibling row instead refits a different literature dataset (Speziale et al. 2001) to 9.5 GPa.
Why this differs from similar rows:
Refit of Speziale et al. [2001] compression data to 9.5 GPa with K' fixed at 4.15; sibling row instead refits Fei [1999] data to 12 GPa.