Browse EOS records
One row per paper — expand to see every matching EOS record from that study.
1 paper · 9 EOS records
2022 9 EOS records Thermal Equations of State of Corundum and Rh2O3 (II)‐Type Al2O3 up to 153 GPa and 3400 K 10.1029/2021jb023805
| Phase | Composition | Tref | V₀ | K₀ (GPa) | K′ | EOS model | Method note | Origin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 165.2 ų Unit cell |
256 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 1 'This study' preferred model with q fixed to 1 (same as Table 3 Model 2); sibling Table 3 rows fix q to different values (0.6, 1.4, 1.8, 2.2), changing the fitted K_T0/V0. | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
— | 163.36 ų Unit cell |
261 | 3.970 | unknown | — | Cited | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table cites theoretical results from Marton and Cohen (1994); other rows cite different theoretical studies (Thomson et al. 1996; Oganov and Ono 2005). | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
— | 165.08 ų Unit cell |
262 | 3.930 | unknown | — | Cited | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table cites theoretical results from Thomson et al. (1996); other rows cite different theoretical studies (Marton and Cohen 1994; Oganov and Ono 2005). | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
— | 165.69 ų Unit cell |
258 | 4.140 | unknown | — | Cited | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table cites theoretical results from Oganov and Ono (2005); other rows cite different theoretical studies (Marton and Cohen 1994; Thomson et al. 1996). | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 165.5 ų Unit cell |
253 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 3 Model 1 with q fixed to 0.6; sibling rows fix q to different values (1, 1.4, 1.8, 2.2), changing the fitted K_T0/V0. | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 165.2 ų Unit cell |
256 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 3 Model 2 with q fixed to 1, identical to the preferred fit in Table 1 'This study'; sibling rows fix q to different values (0.6, 1.4, 1.8, 2.2). | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 164.8 ų Unit cell |
259 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 3 Model 3 with q fixed to 1.4; sibling rows fix q to different values (0.6, 1, 1.8, 2.2), changing the fitted K_T0/V0. | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 164.5 ų Unit cell |
262 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 3 Model 4 with q fixed to 1.8; sibling rows fix q to different values (0.6, 1, 1.4, 2.2), changing the fitted K_T0/V0. | ||||||||||||
| Rh₂O₃(II)-type Al₂O₃ |
|
300 K | 164.2 ų Unit cell |
262 | 4 | third-order Birch-Murnaghan | — | Original | ||||
| Why this differs from similar rows: Table 3 Model 5 with q fixed to 2.2; sibling rows fix q to different values (0.6, 1, 1.4, 1.8), changing the fitted K_T0/V0. | ||||||||||||