Davemaoite
CaSiO3
third-order Birch-Murnaghan · Cited · 2002
Why this differs from similar rows?
Cites Shim et al. [2000] experimental (approximately hydrostatic), V0 assumed (footnote *); compilation Table 2 (Experimental) cites a different original study per row.
V₀
45.58
ų
Unit cell
K₀
236
GPa
Unknown
K′
3.900
dimensionless
Volume (V₀)
| Value | Unit | Basis | Z |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45.58 | ų | Unit cell | — |
Reported value and unit are preserved as extracted. Z (formula units per cell) is not stored yet, so molar ↔ ų/f.u. conversion is not applied automatically.
Composition
| Oxide | Molar |
|---|---|
| CaO | 1 |
| SiO2 | 1 |
Formula: CaSiO3
Conditions & method
- Tref
- —
- Pref
- —
- Structure
- —
- Method
- experiment (XRD / DAC / multianvil compression)experimental, approximately hydrostatic compression (literature)
- Sample
- Shim et al. [2000]
Source
- Paper
- On the structure and compressibility of CaSiO3 perovskite
- Authors
- S. Akber‐Knutson; M. S. T. Bukowinski; J. Matas
- DOI
- 10.1029/2001gl013523
- Year
- 2002
- Journal
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Origin
- Cited (quoted from earlier work)
Evidence from the paper
Table 2 (Experimental): Shim et al. [2000] 45.58*, 236(4), 3.9(2); * Assumed. Text: Shim et al. [2000] and Wang et al. [1996] data are approximately hydrostatic.