Ferropericlase
(Mg0.73Fe0.27)O
third-order Birch-Murnaghan · Cited · 2017
Why this differs from similar rows?
Published fit values from Jacobsen et al. (2002) (methanol-ethanol medium); sibling row is the published fit from a different original study (Jacobsen et al. 2005, helium).
V₀
76.336
ų
Unit cell
K₀
158.400
GPa
Isothermal
K′
5.490
dimensionless
Volume (V₀)
| Value | Unit | Basis | Z |
|---|---|---|---|
| 76.336 | ų | Unit cell | — |
Reported value and unit are preserved as extracted. Z (formula units per cell) is not stored yet, so molar ↔ ų/f.u. conversion is not applied automatically.
Composition
| Oxide | Molar |
|---|---|
| MgO | 0.73 |
| FeO | 0.27 |
Formula: (Mg0.73Fe0.27)O
Conditions & method
- Tref
- 300 K
- Pref
- —
- Structure
- B1 rocksalt (Fm-3m)
- Method
- experiment (XRD / DAC / multianvil compression)single-crystal X-ray diffraction (SXRD), 4:1 methanol-ethanol medium
- Sample
- single crystal in 4:1 methanol-ethanol (Jacobsen et al. 2002, published fit)
Source
- Paper
- Single-crystal equations of state of magnesiowüstite at high pressures
- Authors
- Gregory J. Finkelstein; Jennifer M. Jackson; W. Sturhahn; Dongzhou Zhang; E. Ercan; T. S. Toellner
- DOI
- 10.2138/am-2017-5966
- Year
- 2017
- Journal
- American Mineralogist
- Origin
- Cited (quoted from earlier work)
Evidence from the paper
Table 3: Jacobsen et al. (2002), (Mg0.73Fe0.27)O, Published Fit: 76.336(3), 158.4(4), 5.49(11).
Additional notes
reference
Jacobsen et al. (2002)